The Applicability of Robustness Measures to Water Resources Decision Making
نویسندگان
چکیده
The choice among alternative water supply sources is generally based on the fundamental objective of cost minimisation. There is, however, a need to consider sustainability, the environment and social implications in regional water resources planning, in addition to economics. In order to achieve this, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques can be used. There are a large number of MCDA methods, however, none of them can be considered as appropriate for all decision-making situations. Selection of the most suitable method can therefore be difficult. Various sources of uncertainty exist in the application of MCDA methods including the definition of criteria weights and the assignment of criteria performance values. Robustness / sensitivity analysis can be used to analyse the effects of these uncertainties and in this paper, two existing methods are applied to two water resources case studies. The results indicate that consideration of the various sources of uncertainty should be an integral part of the decision-making process. However, the existing methods could be improved by enabling concurrent alteration of the subjective input values and the method should also be applicable to a range of MCDA techniques.
منابع مشابه
Optimal Cropping Pattern Modifications with the Aim of Environmental-Economic Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Sustainability in agricultural is determined by aspects like economy, society and environment. Multi-objective programming (MOP) model has been a widely used tool for studying and analyzing the sustainability of agricultural system. However, optimization models in most applications are forced to use data which is uncertain. Recently, robust optimization has been used as an optimization model th...
متن کاملPrioritizing Rangeland Improvement Practices using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
Selecting the appropriate rangeland improvement method is a challenging task for range managers because it requires consideration of various criteria. This study was aimed to evaluate various restoration and reclamation practices in the rangelands of Semirom-Isfahan using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Grazing management, water point development, pit seeding, exclosure, water ...
متن کاملClimate changes and the examination of barriers to decision-making with the fuzzy AHP method in the areas of water, food and energy
Introduction and Background: The connections (Nexus) among Water, Food and Energy respresent a number of interdisciplinurt and multi-sectoral complexities and challenges. These complexities are not limited merely to one sector and one or more other sectors are affected by the shocks to one of these resources. Aims: These resources are shaped by climate change; there fore, given the complexities...
متن کاملA revised Fuzzy - PROMETHEE method , using Fuzzy Distance and Similarity Measures
PROMETHEE refers to a collection of methods of ranking in the field of multi-criteria decision making. These methods are characterized by conceptual simplicity and practical applicability. However, the nature of phenomena involving decision-making in real world leads us to use fuzzy method of preference ranking. The most common criticism on mathematical ranking procedures is that they tend to d...
متن کاملEconomics Prioritization of the Allocation of Chahnimeh Reservoir Water Using Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (FMCDM) Models
The main objective of the present study was to prioritize the allocation of water resources of Chahnimeh reservoirs from economic, social, and environmental perspectives in 2015-2016 season using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity of an ideal solution (FTOPSIS) as the branches of fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models. D...
متن کامل